Subscribe
  • Overview
    • Video Tutorials
  • Articles
    • A Closer Look
    • Battleground 2020
    • Capitol Crowd
    • Editorial
    • How It Works
    • Money Myths
    • Race to Raise
    • Spotlight Series
    • Texas Lobbying
    • Top 10 Lists
  • About
  • Search
    • Advanced
  • Overview
  • Articles
  • About
  • Search
  • Subscribe
  • Arizona
  • Florida
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • North Carolina
  • Ohio
  • Pennsylvania
  • Texas
  • Wisconsin
  • 2015 To Now
  • 2016 Election Season
  • 2018 Election Season
  • 2020 Election Season
  • Candidates
  • Donors
  • PACs
  • Payees
  • Lobbying
  • Search
  1. Overview
  2. Articles
  3. Election Takeaways: Does Spending The Most Win Elections?

Follow Us

Number of the Week

Learn More

Related Posts

The Money Behind the Redistricting Committee Chair
The Texas Session: What YOU Want to Know
An Intro to our Texas Lobbying Data
Texas
Race to Raise
Election Takeaways: Does Spending The Most Win Elections?
by Transparency USA
11/12/2020

Does spending the most money during a campaign win elections? Historically, Texas has shown a strong correlation between a candidate’s ability to outspend their opponent(s) and victory on Election Day. 

In 2020, Texas experienced a remarkably expensive election cycle, with almost $536 million spent in Texas state-level campaign finance as of the most recently available reports. Combined with state election results, these numbers allow us to analyze just how strong a predictor campaign finance continues to be for success at the polls. 

We took a look at the results of all the Texas’ legislative races in 2020. Here’s what we found:

According to our data, 119 legislative races on Texas general election ballots this year had more than one candidate, with 14 of those races being for seats in the Texas Senate, and the remaining 105 races being for seats in the Texas House. 

In total, there were 11 races where candidates who spent less were able to defeat opponents who spent more money. That’s just over a 9 percent success rate for the financial underdogs. Put the other way, 108 candidates, roughly 91 percent, of the general election winners in the Texas Legislature were candidates who outspent their opponents. 

The Incumbent Factor

There are many variables that influence why some candidates are able to spend more than others. Visibility, national interest, personal wealth, to name a few. A huge one is incumbency. We’ve covered why incumbents are so successful before, but some reasons include name recognition and special interest groups interested in supporting people in power. Essentially, it’s a “people — and their money — follow winners” mentality.

Notably, seven of the candidates who were able to win while spending less money than their challengers this cycle were incumbents. Two others were running for open seats, and the final two were running against incumbents.

 Races Where the Candidate Who Spent Less Won

RaceIncumbentIncumbent Running?Winning Candidate
Texas Senate District 19Pete Flores (R)YesRoland Gutierrez (D)
Texas House District 47Vikki Goodwin (D)YesVikki Goodwin (D)
Texas House District 54Brad Buckley (R)YesBrad Buckley (R)
Texas House District 67Jeff Leach (R)YesJeff Leach (R)
Texas House District 96Bill Zedler (R)NoDavid Cook (R)
Texas House District 102Ana-Maria Ramos (D)YesAna-Maria Ramos (D)
Texas House District 112Angie Chen Button (R)YesAngie Chen Button (R)
Texas House District 121Steve Allison (R)YesSteve Allison (R)
Texas House District 126E. Sam Harless (R)YesE. Sam Harless (R)
Texas House District 132Gina Calanni (R)YesMike Schofield (R)
Texas House District 138Dwayne Bohac (R)NoLacey Hull (R)

Of the three incumbents who lost re-election, only one was outspent by their opponent. In House District 134, Democrat Ann Johnson outspent Republican incumbent Sarah Davis and won with 52 percent of the vote. 

Breakdown of Open Seats

Candidates who were the bigger spenders also fared better in contests for open seats, where those spending more than their opponents claimed eight open seats in the Texas House and one open seat in the Texas Senate. Meanwhile, just two open seats were won by candidates who spent less than their opponents.

DistrictTop SpenderOther Candidate(s)Winner
Texas Senate District 29Cesar J. Blanco (D)Bethany Hatch (R), David Marino (L)Cesar J. Blanco (D)
Texas House District 2 Bryan Slaton (R)Bill Brannon (D)Bryan Slaton (R)
Texas House District 10 J.K. “Jake” Ellzey (R)Matthias Savino (L)J.K. “Jake” Ellzey (R)
Texas House District 25 Cody Thane Vasut (R)Patrick Henry (D)Cody Thane Vasut (R)
Texas House District 26 Jacey Jetton (R)L. Sarah DeMerchant (D)Jacey Jetton (R)
Texas House District 74Eddie Morales Jr. (D)Ruben Falcon (R)Eddie Morales Jr. (D)
Texas House District 92 Jeff Cason (R)*Jeff Whitfield (D), Chris Hibbard (L), Brody-Andrew Mulligan (G)Jeff Cason (R)
Texas House District 96 Joe Drago (D)*David Cook (R), Nelson Range (L)David Cook (R)
Texas House District 119 Elizabeth Campos (D)George Garza (R), Antonio Padron (G), Arthur Thomas (L)Elizabeth Campos (D)
Texas House District 138 Akilah Bacy (D)*Lacey Hull (R)Lacey Hull (R)
Texas House District 148 Penny Morales Shaw (D)Luis LaRotta (R)Penny Morales Shaw (D)
*In some cases, the candidate who spent the most is different from the candidate who raised the most. This chart focuses on expenditures. Visit the Candidates’ pages to see details about money collected.

So, does spending the most win elections?

It turns out campaign finance spending is still a good predictor of who is likely to win in Texas state politics. The results of the 2020 election demonstrate that defeating a well-funded candidate — particularly when they are an incumbent politician —  is still a long shot.

Want more from the money in Texas politics? Join our email list to stay up-to-date, or search any Texas candidate to see how much money they raised and spent this election cycle.

Support Our Work
  • About
  • Our Team
  • Contact

Subscribe for Updates

States
  • TX
  • AZ
  • FL
  • MI
  • MN
  • NC
  • OH
  • PA
  • TX
  • WI
  • No elements found. Consider changing the search query.
  • List is empty.