While campaign finance is not the only factor in electoral outcomes, successful fundraising can provide a candidate with advantages during a campaign. Fundraising can also indicate party momentum.
Pico California Action Fund Supporting Schools and Communities First-Yes on 15 No on 20
California Committee
$76,001Cash on Hand
$24,198Total Contributions
$348,508Total Expenditures
Financial Activity
Top Contributors
Total Contributions | Name |
---|---|
$14,198.00 | Pico Action Fund ( Non Profit 501(c) (4) ) |
$10,000.00 | East Bay Community Foundation (Nonprofit 501(c)(3)) |
Top Payees
Total Expenditures | Payee |
---|---|
$100,000.00 | California Calls Action Fund for Schools and Communities First - Yes on 15 (Nonprofit 501(c)(4)) |
$39,909.82 | Faith in Action Fund |
$39,024.63 | Working Families for a Better La County Sponsored by La Voice Action |
$23,942.53 | Inland Congregations United for Change |
$17,000.00 | Million Voters Project Action Fund Sponsored by Social Justice Organizations |
$16,206.58 | Faith in the Valley |
$11,000.00 | Sacred Heart Community Services |
$10,000.00 | Housing Leadership Council |
$10,000.00 | North Bay Organizing Project |
$9,531.29 | Meta Platforms Inc - Facebook |
Related Articles
This article details the five candidates who raised the most money and lost their election. In the 2022 election cycle, 20 of 20 general elections were contested. The losing candidates are shown along with the percentage of the vote they received compared to the winner. In cases where the race was pushed to a runoff, vote percentages for both advancing candidates are included.